tatsṛṣṭvā tadevānusṛjya tadanu sṛṣṭvā sṛjyate punaḥ.
“Having created it, He threw it back; and having thrown it back, He created it again.”
Structure
tat sṛṣṭvā tat eva anusṛjya tat anu sṛṣṭvā sṛjyate punaḥ
tat sṛṣṭvā (having created that) eva (indeed) tat anusṛjya (dissolving that) tat anu (after that) sṛṣṭvā (having created) punaḥ (again) sṛjyate (is created)
Word-by-Word Grammar
| Word | IAST | Type | Grammar | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| tat | tat | pronoun | accusative · neuter singular · neuter | that |
| sṛṣṭvā | sṛṣṭvā | verb | √sṛj · past participle · third | having created |
| tat | tat | pronoun | accusative · neuter singular · neuter | that |
| eva | eva | indeclinable | — | indeed |
| anusṛjya | anusṛjya | verb | √sṛj · past participle · third | creating again |
| tat | tat | pronoun | accusative · neuter singular · neuter | that |
| anu | anu | indeclinable | — | after |
| sṛṣṭvā | sṛṣṭvā | verb | √sṛj · past participle · third | having created |
| sṛjyate | sṛjyate | verb | √sṛj · present passive · third | is created |
| punaḥ | punaḥ | indeclinable | — | again |
Scholarly Commentary
Advaita Vedānta (Ādi Śaṅkarācārya): This verse from the Īśopaniṣad underscores the non-dual nature of reality, emphasizing that creation and dissolution are part of an eternal cycle. Śaṅkarācārya, in his commentary on the Īśopaniṣad, highlights the concept of ajāti-vāda, or the theory of non-origination, where the ultimate reality, Brahman, is beyond creation and destruction. He interprets 'tat' as referring to the universe, which is ultimately not separate from Brahman. The cycles of creation (sṛṣṭi) and dissolution (pralaya) are mere appearances (māyā) and do not affect the immutable nature of Brahman. This verse, therefore, points to the identity of Brahman and Ātman, suggesting that the individual self is not separate from the ultimate reality. Through this understanding, one can attain liberation from the cycle of birth and death by realizing the true, unchanging nature of the Self.
Vaiṣṇava tradition (Rāmānujācārya / Madhvācārya): In the Vaiṣṇava tradition, this verse is seen as highlighting the dynamic relationship between the individual soul (jīva) and the Supreme Lord (Īśvara). Rāmānujācārya, in his commentary, emphasizes the concept of viśiṣṭādvaita, or qualified non-dualism, where the jīva and the world are real but dependent on Īśvara. The act of creation and recreation symbolizes the Lord's sovereignty and His intimate involvement with His creation. The verse suggests that the Lord not only creates but also sustains and eventually reabsorbs the creation back into Himself, illustrating His role as both the efficient and material cause of the universe. This interpretation underscores the devotional aspect, encouraging the devotee to cultivate a personal relationship with the Lord, recognizing His grace and control over all aspects of existence.
Neo-Vedānta (Swami Vivekānanda / S. Rādhākrishnan): Swami Vivekānanda and S. Radhakrishnan interpreted this verse in the light of practical Vedānta, emphasizing its relevance to contemporary life. Vivekānanda, in his lectures, often highlighted the cyclical nature of creation, symbolizing the eternal principles of growth, decay, and renewal. This cycle, he argued, applies not just to the cosmos but to individual lives as well, reminding us that every end marks a new beginning. Radhakrishnan, in his writings, connected this verse to the human quest for meaning and the universal aspiration for liberation. He saw the verse as underscoring the importance of understanding the transient nature of worldly attachments and the need to seek the eternal, unchanging reality within. Both thinkers encouraged a practical application of Vedāntic principles, promoting self-realization and service to humanity as key to unlocking individual and collective potential.