tataḥ śvetavrajaṁ dṛṣṭvā mahātejo rudrasammmitaḥ
“Then having seen the white-dwelling (Kṛṣṇa), with great brilliance like Rudra, ”
Structure
tataḥ śveta-vrajaṁ dṛṣṭvā mahā-tejo rudra-sammmitaḥ
rudra-sammmitaḥ (like Rudra) mahā-tejo (having great radiance) tataḥ (then) śveta-vrajaṁ (the white encampment) dṛṣṭvā (having seen)
Word-by-Word Grammar
| Word | IAST | Type | Grammar | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| tataḥ | tataḥ | indeclinable | — | then, thereafter |
| śveta-vrajaṁ | śveta-vrajaṁ | compound | karmadhāraya · "śvetaḥ vrajaḥ" | white (or fair) abode or region |
| dṛṣṭvā | dṛṣṭvā | indeclinable | — | having seen, on seeing |
| mahā-tejo | mahā-tejo | compound | karmadhāraya · "mahat tejo" | one having great splendor |
| rudra-sammmitaḥ | rudra-sammmitaḥ | compound | karmadhāraya · "rudrasammmitaḥ" | resembling Rudra |
Scholarly Commentary
Advaita Vedānta (Ādi Śaṅkarācārya): This verse from the Mahābhārata, 'tataḥ śvetavrajaṁ dṛṣṭvā mahātejo rudrasammmitaḥ', when considered through the lens of Advaita Vedānta, points towards the ultimate reality of non-duality. Śaṅkarācārya, in his commentary on the Brahmasūtras, often emphasizes the importance of recognizing the ātman as the ultimate reality, beyond all attributes and forms. In the context of this verse, the description of Kṛṣṇa as 'mahātejo rudrasammmitaḥ' (with great brilliance like Rudra) can be seen as an allegory for the unbounded energy and consciousness that pervades all existence. This identification of Kṛṣṇa with Rudra, a form of Śiva, underscores the idea that all deities and manifestations are ultimately expressions of the one, unchanging Brahman. Thus, this verse supports the non-dual reading where the distinction between the individual self (ātman) and the universal self (Brahman) is transcended, leading to the realization of their fundamental identity.
Vaiṣṇava tradition (Rāmānujācārya / Madhvācārya): In the Vaiṣṇava tradition, this verse is significant for its depiction of Kṛṣṇa, who is considered the supreme deity. Rāmānujācārya, in his commentary on the Bhagavad Gītā, emphasizes the personal relationship between the jīva (individual soul) and Īśvara (the Lord), highlighting the path of bhakti (devotion) as the means to attain liberation. The description of Kṛṣṇa as 'śvetavrajaṁ' (white-dwelling) might symbolize the pure and luminous nature of the divine. For Rāmānujācārya, such verses would underscore the importance of recognizing and worshiping the Lord in His various forms and attributes, as a means of cultivating devotion and ultimately achieving liberation through the grace of God. Madhvācārya, with his emphasis on the difference between the Lord and the individual souls, would likely interpret the comparison with Rudra as a demonstration of Kṛṣṇa's supremacy and unique position among all divine beings.
Neo-Vedānta (Swami Vivekānanda / S. Rādhākrishnan): Swami Vivekānanda, in his lectures and writings, often emphasized the practical application of Vedāntic principles in daily life, stressing the importance of realizing one's true nature as divine. This verse, with its vivid imagery of Kṛṣṇa's brilliance and power, can be seen as a call to awaken to one's inner potential and spirituality. Vivekānanda would likely interpret the 'śvetavrajaṁ' as a symbol of the pure and untouched consciousness that lies within every individual, waiting to be discovered. The comparison with Rudra, representing transformation and change, might be seen as an invitation to embark on a journey of self-discovery and spiritual growth, overcoming the limitations and impurities that obscure one's true nature. Similarly, S. Radhakrishnan, in his philosophical works, would connect this verse to the broader theme of the universal quest for the absolute, highlighting the importance of integrating spiritual insights into everyday life and fostering a sense of global community and understanding.